Case Study: Should I do this?
The wide reach of The Planned Giving Design Center (PGDC) leads to many interesting opportunities, not the least of which are questions from donors about gift structures, strange opportunities or other inquiries. Most recently Lee received a call from an inquisitive gentleman from the East Coast which he promptly turned over to me. It was a “should I do this?” call. Essentially, a proposal was on the table and he was confused by it.
Here are the facts as he explained them to me. He is sixty-eight years old, still working and quite healthy. He is divorced, has two grown children and a significant other. His total assets are around $5 million, but $2 million is in his IRA account. His main concern is that when he turns age 70½ he will have to begin required minimum distributions (RMDs) from his IRA and he doesn’t need the money to live on. Essentially, he will be paying tax on income that he doesn’t want. Currently, he gifts regularly to his University but he’s been doing that with appreciated securities.
An advisor (I’m not sure if it was a planned giving officer, an attorney or financial advisor) suggested the following: withdraw his entire IRA account and place the proceeds into a Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (CLAT). Without all of the information, I was able to determine that the CLAT was a Grantor CLAT, that is, the income tax deduction would flow through to his personal return. According to the advice he would receive a 90% income tax deduction. My later calculations suggest that a 15 year, 7% payout trust would accomplish something close to that result. Gathering some more information, I determined that this transaction would add about $140,000 to his current year income taxes and raise his marginal rate from 28% to 39.6%.
How does this transaction benefit our East Coast friend? Certainly, he does withdraw $2 million of IRA assets for only $140,000 of income tax. And he is able to make $140,000 per year of gifts for 15 years. He has gotten most of the toxic IRA asset out of his estate and has avoided a lot of income in respect of a decedent tax (IRD) for his heirs.
Is there a downside? Several, actually. First, he loses access to his capital for 15 years and though he is healthy and working now, it’s impossible to know how long that will continue. He may also have given away $2 million and, thus, disinherited his heirs from those funds. If the CLAT earns 7% or less, there will be little, if any capital left. And while, his income tax is “only” $140,000, he still has accelerated the payment of that tax into the current year.
What else could he do that could be considered? Again, several things come to mind. First, he could wait to see if the Charitable IRA Rollover is re-enacted and make an annual gift that way. Second, he could name a Charitable Remainder Trust as the beneficiary of his IRA and allow that income stream to benefit his children and significant other. While this would delay the gift to charity, there is nothing to stop him from making annual gifts to charity from his RMDs. He could also name his University as the beneficiary of the IRA and purchase life insurance to replace the asset for his heirs instead.
Want to know my answer to “should I do this?” Tell me what you think. Yes or No? Or do you have another recommedation? Leave a comment below.
Add comment
Comments